<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jess Coburn&#039;s Personal Blog &#187; Server Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jesscoburn.com/tags/server-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jesscoburn.com</link>
	<description>Windows Web Hosting, Web Technologies, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:58:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Read that EULA &amp; PUR! That&#8217;s what I learned today!</title>
		<link>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/10/03/read-that-eula-pur-thats-what-i-learned-today/</link>
		<comments>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/10/03/read-that-eula-pur-thats-what-i-learned-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/10/03/read-that-eula-pur-thats-what-i-learned-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently posted a blog entry about my &#8216;informal&#8217; apples to oranges comparison of the different virtualization platforms available for windows. Apparently I didn&#8217;t spell it out clear enough that things were not on a level playing field.&#160; Well, guys I did it. I went and pissed off Bob. Sorry Bob. But Bob taught me&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/10/03/read-that-eula-pur-thats-what-i-learned-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which VPS platform is the fastest? Benchmarking Virtuozzo, VMWare and Microsoft Virtual Server on Windows.</title>
		<link>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/10/01/which-vps-platform-is-the-fastest-benchmarking-virtuozzo-vmware-and-microsoft-virtual-server-on-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/10/01/which-vps-platform-is-the-fastest-benchmarking-virtuozzo-vmware-and-microsoft-virtual-server-on-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Webhosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/10/01/which-vps-platform-is-the-fastest-benchmarking-virtuozzo-vmware-and-microsoft-virtual-server-on-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve pulled the article until I have time to properly benchmark all three systems on identical hardware, hopefully after the holidays.&#160; Although I used different hardware, I firmly believe my numbers provided a reasonable estimate of what performance you would see using identical hardware.&#160;&#160; I&#8217;d had verbal feedback from others that in fact they saw&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/10/01/which-vps-platform-is-the-fastest-benchmarking-virtuozzo-vmware-and-microsoft-virtual-server-on-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Server 2005 R2 &amp; iSCSI</title>
		<link>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/03/02/virtual-server-2005-r2-iscsi/</link>
		<comments>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/03/02/virtual-server-2005-r2-iscsi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Webhosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesscoburn.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has an article available regarding Virtual Server 2005 R2 and iSCSI. I&#39;ve been digging around on the forums and&#160;it seems the only way to really get the performance out of this is by having the iSCSI storage on the actual host machine. I haven&#39;t played with it, don&#39;t know&#160;enough&#160;about it but&#160;I do know iSCSI&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/03/02/virtual-server-2005-r2-iscsi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Server SCSI or IDE drives and why is SCSI so damn slow?</title>
		<link>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/03/02/virtual-server-scsi-or-ide-drives-and-why-is-scsi-so-damn-slow/</link>
		<comments>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/03/02/virtual-server-scsi-or-ide-drives-and-why-is-scsi-so-damn-slow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Webhosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesscoburn.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So in the Virtual Server how to on setting up a 2 node cluster there was mention that you should select the SCSI drive emulatored because the IDE emulator was slower than the SCSI one and that this was true even if you were running on IDE disks. Strange, right? Virtual PC Guy recently wrote&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/03/02/virtual-server-scsi-or-ide-drives-and-why-is-scsi-so-damn-slow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creating a Virtual Server 2005 Cluster</title>
		<link>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/01/11/creating-a-virtual-server-2005-cluster/</link>
		<comments>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/01/11/creating-a-virtual-server-2005-cluster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Webhosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesscoburn.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Server Virtualization is becoming a&#160;major item these days and is many companies are adopting it. I&#39;ve heard storys all over the place from development to production, from guys using it to setup test labs of multiple servers using only a handful of boxes to companies replacing 700 physical servers with less than 350. For the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jesscoburn.com/archives/2006/01/11/creating-a-virtual-server-2005-cluster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using wincache (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using wincache
Database Caching 1/22 queries in 0.043 seconds using wincache
Object Caching 672/713 objects using wincache

Served from: www.jesscoburn.com @ 2012-02-11 07:28:37 -->
